The Apple TV+ historical drama shortchanged viewers on Hawaiian history and culture
Copyright © 2025 by Stephen Shender
The first season of Apple TV+’s “Chief of War” is complete. What to make of it? Rotten Tomatoes gives the series about the fight to unify the Hawaiian Islands an overwhelming 93 percent approval rating, based on a survey of critics’ reviews. Here’s a brief sampling:
The San Jose Mercury News’s Randy Myers has called it “invigorating, compelling, and sweeping.”
David Opie of Empire Magazine praised “Chief of War” for cutting a “brutal swathe through epic chapters of Hawaiian history, long unseen and long overdue on screen.”
Kelly Lawler of USA Today called the series “transportive, immersive, and enlightening – the prettiest and bloodiest history lesson you'll get all year.”
From Hawaii to Asia, “Chief of War” has been sweeping. It’s surely been immersive when it’s been bloody. But it hasn’t been a “history lesson.”
As the author of a novel covering the same historical ground as “Chief of War” (and more), I see this as the show’s biggest problem.
New York Times TV critic Mike Hale took note of this when he wrote that “Chief of War” was “stuffed with people...who existed and with events that took place, but the story that is spun from them is largely fanciful.”
Why make such a big deal over “Chief of War’s” fanciful departures from Hawaiian history? Empire Magazine’s Opie perhaps unwittingly answered that question with his praise of “Chief of War” for bringing a story “long unseen” to the screen.
None of “Chief of War’s” viewers, and no TV critics, have ever seen this story on screen. Moreover, many of them—viewers and critics alike—have likely never read a book about it or learned about it anywhere else.
Before “Chief of War” premiered on August 1, its prospective audience, including critics, was a tabula rasa—a clean slate. As the first filmmakers to bring Hawaii’s unification story to a popular audience, “Chief of War’s” Hawaii-born creators Jason Momoa and Thomas Pa‘a Sibbett had an opportunity to create something truly unique. Going to a place no filmmakers had gone before, they were free to tell an untold story of the Hawaiian people from the Hawaiians’ unknown point of view to a large, popular audience. Historically, they muffed it.
I’ve already written at length—you might say ad nauseam—about Momoa’s and Pa‘a Sibbett’s dislocation of and departures from Hawaiian history. “Chief of War” viewers expecting a drama that faithfully reflected Hawaiian history, as well as viewers with no prior knowledge of Hawaiian history, were shortchanged.
“Chief of War” also shortchanged viewers culturally. Momoa said a goal of the series was to “immerse” viewers in Hawaiian culture. But the immersion was a mile wide and an inch deep.
The creators of “Chief of War” accurately depicted the appurtenances of Hawaiian culture, including grass houses, clothing, weapons, temples, sail canoes, and religious idols. They introduced viewers to a Hawaiian war god and name-checked a few other Hawaiian deities. Actors spoke Hawaiian throughout the series, and almost exclusively during the first two episodes, imbuing “Chief of War” with an air of authenticity. For all that, “Chief of War” was cultural kitsch. (The New York Times TV reviewer called it “Polynesian kitsch.”)
“Chief of War” never explored aspects of Hawaiian culture that could’ve immersed viewers in life as Hawaiians of Kamehameha’s and Ka‘iana’s day lived it. For example:
- The complexities of the Hawaiians’ strict kapu, harsh laws that barred men and women from eating together and reserved certain foods exclusively for men, for example, and imposed dire penalties for many other transgressions.
- An ali‘i caste-structure that ranked Hawaiian nobility based on the inter- and intragenerational purity of their bloodlines.
- The all-pervading importance of mana, spiritual power that could be won or lost in myriad ways.
- Hawaiian society’s mutual sexual liberation of men and women.
- The political power wielded by women, who could rule villages as “chiefesses” even as they were barred from eating certain foods.
“Chief of War’s” creators could have injected more aspects of Hawaiian culture into the series’ slower scenes, which at least two critics suggested needed some juice.
Empire Magazine’s Opie wrote, “you…wish the quieter moments carried as much weight as the barbaric battles.” And Daniel Fienberg of the Hollywood Reporter predicted that “many viewers will be more than happy to ignore the poorly developed ethical debates and flimsy romances that fill so much of the nine hours.” Talk about damning with faint praise.
The first rule of good storytelling is “show, don’t tell.”
What if, in place of characters talking about ethics, Momoa and Pa‘a Sibbett had written a scene showing Kamehameha dealing with an ethical conundrum?
In episode 6 of “Chief of War,” Kamehameha tells his council he’s proclaiming a law to protect peaceful civilians because he was attacked by villagers who thought he meant to assault them. (A mouthful to recall, which it was to listen to.)
Instead of all the talk, why not show Ka‘iana dragging a commoner before the council because the fellow has attacked him? When it turns out that Ka‘iana has unwarrantedly menaced the accused, Kamehameha pardons the suspect and proclaims his law of the ”splintered paddle.” Historically, that’s not what happened (but so much of what happens in “Chief of War” isn’t). A scene like that is more culturally immersive than talk of mercy alone, and it serves the story by heightening the growing tension between peace-loving Kamehameha and his hot-headed ally Ka‘iana.
Momoa and Pa‘a Sibbett deserve praise for exposing a large popular audience to obscure Hawaiian history for the first time. It’s a singular achievement. But historically and culturally, the first season of “Chief of War” could have been better. I hope it will be better in a subsequent season, if there is one. Failing that, “Chief of War” can serve as a baseline for a future historical drama about 18th-century Hawaii and the unification of the Hawaiian Islands.
Stephen Shender is the author of Once There Was Fire, A Novel of Old Hawaii, about the life of King Kamehameha I and the unification of the Hawaiian Islands.







